Sarah Kendzior

Writer at Al Jazeera English

Should Academics Write For Free?

Full_10272014-sunsetblvd

In 2006, I published my first article in an academic journal, a lengthy analysis debunking the existence of an Uzbek terrorist organization. I called my mother to tell her the news.

“Great,” she said. “What are they paying you?”

“Nothing.”

She laughed. Then she realized I was serious.

I had come to academia from journalism, which, at the time, paid people. Less than a decade ago, it was reasonable for journalists to expect that a corporation profiting off their labor would offer a modicum of compensation. Working for nothing—or nothing’s contemporary euphemism, “exposure”—was laughable.

I explained to my mother that academic publishing was different. Writing for money could potentially compromise the objectivity of the research. Publishing was part of the academic’s job, allegedly reflected in his or her university salary. Only the scholarly databases which housed academic work made a significant profit.

Seven years later, journalism has adopted the academic publishing model, only without the pretense of integrity. The 2008 economic crisis, combined with the transition to digital media, led to a glut of desperate writers willing to work for free—a practice that media corporations embraced and repackaged to novice journalists as “the way things have always been.”

Today media outlets making healthy profits refuse to pay the freelance writers who help make them a success. Exploitative publishers tend to argue along two lines: a fake crisis (“Unfortunately, we can’t afford to pay you at this time…”) or a false promise (“Exposure will help your career.”).

Academics are particularly vulnerable to media-industry exploitation. They are accustomed to writing for nothing and, in the case of adjuncts, to being treated terribly by their employers. Because academic work in professional journals is hidden behind paywalls, the prospect of reaching a wider audience can be enticing. For scholars interested in leaving academia and forging a new career, online visibility is essential.

Should academics ever write for free? Maybe.

Should academics write for free for a publisher that can afford to pay them? Never.

When you write for free for a profitable mainstream publisher, you deny yourself fair compensation while normalizing exploitation. You deserve better, and so do the writers who suffer when a fellow writer is treated as less than they are worth. Here are a few tips to stop getting screwed and start getting paid.

Unpaid writing leads to more unpaid writing. One of the cruelest lies of the media industry is the idea that writing for free is both obligatory while starting out and a proven path to success. The idea that writers must work for free presupposes that writers must be rich to work—an idea we, as a society, should reject.

It is also misleading. Claiming that writing for exposure leads to a paying job is like saying that adjuncting gets you a tenure-track position—and we all know how that turns out. For every story of success, there are thousands of exploitation. “You’ll get exposure whether you’re paid or not. So choose to get paid,” writes Joshua Foust, a prominent foreign-affairs analyst. Foust knows what he’s talking about: He wrote dozens of columns for The Atlantic and never received a dime.

Your academic position does not matter. Publishers like to evoke academics’ professional status to justify not paying them. But what you do on your own time is irrelevant. It does not matter if you are already receiving an income from your academic position: If the article is good enough to publish, then the writer is good enough to be paid.Keep in mind that your status as expert and scholar is helping the publication gain credibility. You deserve to be compensated.

Professional writing is not the same thing as personal blogging—at least, when it comes to money. Academic bloggers publish high-quality, accessible work as good (or better) than that of mainstream publications. But when those publications come calling, academic bloggers, used to not being paid for either their blogging or their research, often do not ask for compensation. They should. The difference between personal blogging and professional writing is that, in the case of the latter, a media organization is profiting from your labor—and if you are already a prominent online writer, they are benefiting from your reputation and audience. Get paid.

Do your research. As in academia, discussing money in journalism was taboo until everyone started wondering why they did not have any. Websites like the newly launched Who Pays Writers are a good source for determining the standard rate of a publication. Do not ask a publication “whether” you will be paid. Assume you will, and politely ask how much before you agree to write. Acting like payment is optional can end up making it so.

Academics entering the media world tend to move from one exploitative arena (low-wage academic work) to another (unpaid freelance writing). But writing must never be an act of charity to a corporation. Ask for what you are worth—and do not accept that you are worth nothing. Insisting on payment for your labor is not a sign of entitlement. It is a right to which you are entitled.

Sarah Kendzior is a St. Louis-based writer who covers politics, media and education.

You. Your Career. Vitae.

Tell your academic story. Build your network. Manage your career. All with Vitae – the first online career hub just for higher education.

Join Vitae Signing up is fast, easy and free.

Badge

Join the Conversation

1 Comment
Log In or Sign Up to leave a comment.
  • The problem about pay for writing is that when we get paid, we are usually publishing in a non peer reviewed periodical. I have published over 65 pieces for pay but they do not contribute to my vitae because I got paid by a commercial magazine and not a scholarly journal that follows standard peer review protocols. And, all the peer reviewed work that I have published I did without pay. Making it even more egregious is that now many journals require author fees to be paid to be published after peer review approves the work. The fees I have been faced with range from $300-$1500 and one association required a two year membership fee paid and $100 cash to publish your peer approved scholarly work. Few universities are picking up these fees for author/professors. Also, I serve gratis for journals as editor, assistant editor, department editor or member of the editorial board also without compensation. Generally, I cannot even get a "sweat equity" trade on my work as a reviewer in order to get the fee waived. In some cases, it can be waived, especially since I am an adjunct professor without full institutional support. But, the scholarship must go on and so do I. So, I either don't get paid or I actually pay to get my peer reviewed work published because I want my work out there as most scholars do. How can we get the system to change? And, where would scholarly journals that do not advertise find the revenues to pay authors after covering the overhead costs of printing and mailing hard cover journals or paying for online time for online journals? And finally, it is real: publish or perish! Without publications; no job, no promotion, no tenure; so, I can pump gas at Texaco! LOL

    Dr. Michael W. Popejoy

    Michael Popejoy